Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Murray Kubler vs Zhe Li Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kubler vs Li analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Murray Kubler vs Zhe Li Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kubler 2 - 0 Li
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kubler has won 46.15% of points on their second serve, while Li has won 49.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kubler, in recent form, has won 53.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Li has won 35.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.58% and 23.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kubler has saved 53.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Li has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kubler has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 10/ 9), with Li winning 66.67% (W/L 26/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 434/ 303), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 28% (W/L 7/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Kubler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 7/ 1), where as Li has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 16/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kubler winning 2 times and Li being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kubler winning 4 and Li winning 1. The last match between Kubler and Li was at the Burnie Challenger, 31-01-2020, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kubler and Li have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kubler winning 1 times and Li 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kubler winning 1, and Li 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kubler has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.16 while Li has played against players with an average rank of 233.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kubler has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Li has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kubler has converted 32.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Li has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
209
Rank
63
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
528
Rank
193
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
67% (407-204)
Career Total W/L
57% (464-349)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$1,200,795
Career Prize Money
$32,170
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Zhe Li |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:10 | 1:40:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (97/128) | 63% (92/147) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (80/97) | 70% (64/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (16/31) | 47% (26/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (57/147) | 25% (32/128) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Zhe Li
74%
(
68 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
14
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Zhe Li
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Murray Kubler | Zhe Li |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (42/49) | 43% (22/29) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:55:34 | 1:46:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 48 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (193/297) | 61% (92/151) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (122/193) | 73% (67/92) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (48/104) | 49% (29/59) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (12/37) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (123/318) | 30% (45/152) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
68%
(
137 of
202)
1st Serve %
62%
(
109 of
175)
16
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
90 of
137)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
71 of
109)
43%
(
28 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
84 of
202)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
71 of
175)
189
Total Points Won
188
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hugo Gaston
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
67%
(
92 of
137)
1st Serve %
55%
(
77 of
140)
30
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
11
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
40 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
148
Total Points Won
129
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Ugo Humbert
66%
(
104 of
157)
1st Serve %
57%
(
77 of
135)
10
Aces
24
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
62 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
135)
147
Total Points Won
145
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhe Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Zhe Li
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
7
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Zhe Li
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Zhe Li
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Tatsuma Ito
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Omni Kumar
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Zhe Li
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Piotr Matuszewski
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Zhe Li
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
19
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kubler Vs Li Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
